9. * Bugs, Feedback and Suggestions. high evasion). Energy Weapons (Lasers, Neutron Launchers etc. So now disruptors are bad. Since I like the mechanics and feeling like a Star Trek villain, I use disruptor fleets. A sidenote, that the actual casualties of the dirsuptor were MUCH greater pretty much all the time. The problem that lasers and railguns have is that they just don't have damage or range. Learn more about Ships Reworked at GameJunkie. Reply. 462. if your opponents don't really use either of those weapon types then both flak and pd are mostly useless. Again, fill up free slots with missiles, and you want the line computer (the stats aren't great, but you need a computer. Disruptors can be equipped on the artillery slot of battleships right? You use them after high repeatables for 10x or 25x crisis since it ignores their armor and shields. Autocannon corvettes will wreck the missile corvettes or even just disruptor corvettes. B. . 6 and will get you killed by anything that isn't a disruptor corvette. But back to the OP, mixed (mono)fleet tactics will normally win out vs all monofleets. The Disruptor and Autocannon do pair decently with the torp. Always make your own if you can help it. At 40 repetitions you have increased the damage by 200%. + Ignores 100% Armor. Missiles penetrate shields, so there's a viable argument for shield hardeners to some extent. I know stellaris ship design is a lot of countering enemy ships, but in general, is having a fleet that mainly targets hull a…Stellaris. Then create two ships, and deck it out the exact opposite of what you did with your fleet. Disruptors can become quite powerful for a late-game empire that has completed the +5% energy weapon tech repeatable 40 or more times. E. 6 patch notes, the latest Orion update brings a fleet combat rebalance and ascension path rework plus a new ascension path (requires Utopia). Absolutely any explanation of disruptors is basically garbage from top to bottom, much more so than any other. )Mr. Which means they completely ignore shields and armor so you only need to worry about the opposing fleets hull points. Signature Weapons [3. modifier. Disruptors are mostly niche. Hmm I guess I was thinking of energy siphons cause your right disruptors just ignore shields and armor, I just looked on the Stellaris wiki. Pure shield/disruptor corvettes are deadly against the Contingency, for example. Tier 0 is used for starting technologies. Feedback on where you faced an issue can. Disruptors I mostly don't use unless I somehow get very late game where their shield and armour piercing negates the stacks of repeatable techs. Plasma is good, but it should also be paired with kinetic weapons. A fleet will initiate FTL travel when any ship in. I'm not a fan of this new type of ship parameter. Sillez_zockt. 6 Fleet Meta Prediction. Another good strategy is to use cloaking to engage at point blank range. The trick is that you need to commit to either all disruptors, or no disruptors. PD starts with 10 Tracking and ends with 30. You equip the same as with any others. Members Online •. Otherwise disruptors and autocannons. Compatible with Stellaris V2. 1. Disruptors and Defense platforms are both terrible for the same reason: disengagement. All it does is make the first technology in every line of weapons into a rare technology, but upgrades to that. 3. Both! Kinetic weapons have a bonus against Shields and malus against Armor, while Laser ones have the opposite. Paradox Interactive has revealed Stellaris: First Contact, the new Story Pack for their sci-fi grand strategy game that enhances the opening to a campaign with new origin stories for your chosen civilFixed mechanical fallen empires missing part of their ringworlds. 0 unless otherwise noted. - "Only" 50% AP, No Bonus vs. So close to uninstall what a sad. Flavor entry is displayed if accompanied by a change to effects/requirements. Prioritizing physics will allow you to unlock new weapons, armor. Fist one is supper effective against shields but utterly useless against hull, second one ignores shields but have ridiculous min damage of 1. Best example is disruptors. TTundri • 6 mo. . Torpedo assault carrier is the most balanced ship design. 0 unless otherwise noted. They are capable of passing through shields and armor to. You could also use battleships with large weapons to damage them from a distance. Notes: The table shows the default names/icons of techs. Kusto_ • 5 mo. 8000. As armour and shield rises, the more a Disruptor's worth can rise. CryptoStellaris 50512 Bug Reports 31005 Suggestions 19176 Tech Support 2909 Multiplayer 377 User Mods 4633 Stellaris AAR (After Action Reports) Console edition 1219. Stellaris UI Suggestion: Stellaris UI Improvement (Planet UI and Build Queues) EU4 Suggestion: Improving Development: Development: Dynamic and Mana-based. Make a species with Engineering, natural intelligence and sedentary, use the mechanist origin. Technology IDs. TTundri • 6 mo. You can take out most stations from beyond there weapon range with carries without so much as a scratch on your ship but if a. Has Anyone found this weapon to be any good? I'll admit I've never tried it due to it's low damage output even though all the damage goes straight to…In Stellaris, the Unbidden are beings from a dimension of pure energy. As a fleet 3. There aren't any other direct-fire weapons that skip shields, and in the later game the enemy shields and armor (but not hull) increase a bunch. Nov 9, 2018 97 0. Missiles in general are the best weapons till battleships, so upgrading those should become part of your tech choices. All types of explosive weapons are your friend, especially in vast quantities that no amount of PD can stop. By comparison, 4 Corvettes will have 12 Small Disruptors which gives 52 DPS. The problem that lasers and railguns have is that they just don't have damage or range. The counter to disruptors are weapons. Paradox have released the latest DLC for Stellaris with the First Contact Story Pack, along with a free update for all players. Yeah, I run pure plasma and haven't had issues against the AI. The Missile Corvettes (only using Missiles) are good for a few things, mainly dealing with ships that don’t have anti-missile defenses and Starbases. They are good against all Corvettes except the ones that are equipped with Phase Disruptors or Picket Ship modules. Description. To expand on this, disrupters have lower DPS than kinetics or energy weapons, to compensate for the fact that they bypass shields and armor. Every time a ship is hit by an attack when at low hull it has a chance to disengage, and a low damage weapon like the Disruptor gives them so many chances to disengage that you won't kill anything. Command Center ( Aura that grants +10% firerate), Defense Grid Supercomputer (+8 Defense Platform points) and Target Uplink Computer (+50% Weapon Range) are the obvious choices. The higher tier energy weapons have much greater range than the plasma weapons do, higher dps, and at least for the s/m/l slots the lasers have higher tracking and accuracy. problem is aside. The Humans discovered this, and ended up fighting the Flood, which they lost really bad and started to go on the run. This is a problem that most modifiers have in Stellaris; instead of each one multiplying the output of the previous one, they all get added together and then applied to the base value. Torpedoes fire slowly, and do extra damage based on how big the target is. Though ground warfare is necessary to achieve ultimate victory, landing armies is safer once the fleet has eliminated the threat of enemy vessels intercepting and destroying vulnerable troop transports. The best anti-Corvette weapons are Hangars (ignores shields), Autocannons (gets massive damage bonus against shields), and Disruptors (ignores shields), so shielding is nearly useless. Mining lasers are now classified as Brawling weapons. 10] This mod aims to guide the AI empires to design its ship designs more effectively and adds a few ship sections I felt were lacking. Giga Cannons have longer range (150) than the launchers (130) and strip the shields first; then the Neutron Launchers blow the enemy up. Two autocannos and a plasma makes them quite good. Neutron launchers front load, making for far superior weapons for L slots. Malaficus Shaikan May 6, 2022 @ 11:15pm. Disruptors have niche because they do direct hull damage, which can't endlessly scale up unlike the survivability repeatables for. Disruptors fire high-energy bolts that weaken and destroy the molecular bonds that hold the target's constituent atoms together. 2. 6. Disruptors and Autocannons are now considered Brawling weapons, with short range but faster attacks. Stellaris: The Missile Meta - In this video I explore how powerful the missile meta is in the new 3. 3. The lack of good anti-armor weapons for Corvettes means that bypassing armor completely is often your best choice, going with 3 Disruptors. Disruptor Strike Craft - 3 levels unlocked with the appropriate disruptor technology and strike craft technology; Null Void Strike Craft - 1 level unlocked with null void and strike craft 3. I like to use Kinetic for the initial long range engagement (Shields are still up) and Laser for smaller, shorter range weapons meant to finish the job by mostly damaging the remaining Armor and Hull. Winning battles across the stars is about adapting to the enemy's loadout and. AI is so bad you could have PD spam as your dps as long as you have the numbers. But it also penetrates armor by 50%. I may be talking complete nonsense here, but I think plasma + disruptor is the best way to go. r/Stellaris. 1 Anti-Armor 2. That holds true enough in Stellaris and Rapid Deployment helps a lot with it. Alle Diskussionen Screenshots Artworks Übertragungen Videos Workshop Neuigkeiten Guides Rezensionen. Unbidden fleets. Within a year after colonizing the planet in the system, an event. Disruptors have never been anything to write home about, so you can ignore them. Subscribe to download. Disruptors are awful because of short range, while the pitiful damage means high number of opportunities for emergency FTL, which reduces your number of actual kills especially if you are invading. But yea, I don't consider disruptors a weapon, their stats make much better point defense even in a medium slot. Better to instead build battleships with void lightning if you have it, or kinetic artillery/neutron launchers otherwise. Two autocannos and a plasma makes them quite good. (If you are all missles then create two ships that are point defense only. Just slap those bois everywhere till you get battleships, then rush for arc emitters and kill void clouds to get cloud lightning. The sounds of its distress excite the corvettes all the more and their behaviour becomes ever more agitated. Increase the maximum range of weapons by 100% or so. Home;. Disruptors ignore shields and armor completely and do damage on the hull directly. The AI tends to run balanced defences. So what's your opinion on the ascension rework in 3. A destroyer with lightning cloud and two s disruptors is a good, solid build. While -100% job upkeep is a strong bonus, it's not inherently overpowered. For your defenses use as many shields as you can to counter their energy weaponry. It was created by user Turanar, and is being kept up. Corvettes are why missile spam is good right now. 10 Pyxis update - you can find a bit more info on the Steam page. The more raw HP there is to take down, the less it's worth. Wouldn't be a terrible choice of weapons either, though obviously not the optimal choice. Just swap the artillery core for the carrier core and leave everything else the same. If you want specifically Destoryers, it depends on the corvettes you are facing. 2 Shields is overkill. 64 DPS. ; About Stellaris Wiki; Mobile view Full Disruptor fleets can be a thing, but the issue is raw DPS. L-Cluster. It starts out small with disruptor fleets having deceptively small fleet power values and taking out fleets double their size or so, eventually runs up to battleships where you take out the enemy's ships when they either only take out your. ”. That's not a good strategy. 3. 3. Darvin3 • 2 yr. So 15% high damage, but the Corvette has a number of other advantages. Alpha strike is often decisive in Stellaris fleet actions, and giving it up hurts. 1) Cruisers are "poor man battleships" and should be avoided. Disruptor-Corvette: Strengths: Hard wins against every small ship in the game (Destroyer and below) Weaknesses: Hard loses to everything else Techs needed: Disruptors (optional: better thrusters, after burner) Required Components: best Thruster, Swarm Computer Sections: Interceptor S-slots: 3 DisruptorsA place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. which remains a valid alternative to 2 medium Phased Disruptors due to low alloy cost, low power usage, slightly better range, and the fact that battleships can't have pure M. If you don't have either, try and get them ASAP. Create 10 ships exactly the same in everything exept weapons. Focus on getting combat computer tech and use swarm. If that's the case, you want a screen of corvettes/destroyers rocking PD and Ion Disruptors. Coil/Ripper or Lazer corvettes are more useful than Plasma/Missile/PD/Flak corvettes for general use. 9 Meta Update] We are all aware that Stellaris ship design has had a massive rebalance, and with that the combat system and the overall pace of the game. Community Hub. Oct 21, 2022; Add bookmark #1 At first I had them as Torpedo gunships in my Corvette fleets for mobile starbase removal. Energy weapons also have a "special" kinds of weapons (Disruptors and Arc Emitters) that ignore both shields and armor, all damage goes directly to the hull but the overall damage can be pretty low. Disruptors are good as well, or at least the Small and X-Large ones (Arc Emitters) are. The main advantage is that by the End-Game phase (assuming default 2200) you should have a few levels of repeatable tech on Physics for Energy Weapons to make AE+D+CL combo more powerful. For the Unbidden, their big deal is HUGE shields, and not much else; while you. ; About Stellaris Wiki; Mobile viewThe advantage of Disruptors is how early you can get them, and how long they last into late/endgame. Every time a ship is hit by an attack when at low hull it has a chance to disengage, and a low damage weapon like the Disruptor gives them so many chances to disengage that you won't kill anything. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. A properly kitted equals size fleet (Kinetic artilley to start combat, and something like plasma for closer ranges), will output 4-5x more damage with all the extra modifiers. In Stellaris "It depends" is very much the thing. I've noticed that my neighbors…In my current game, where I had to be defensive for the first 120 years, I found disruptors to be optimal (didn't have to worry about multiple…Devouring swarm, strike craft, and disruptors for green beams that go through shield and armor for the "acid". troyunrau • President • 7 yr. So what's. 0 “Pyxis” and the Astral Planes Narrative Expansion released last. Rule Zero of Stellaris combat: autodesigned ships suck so much they have an event horizon. Anti-Corvette Fleet. Plasma Weapons: + More base damage than disruptors, but less than a laser. This page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 11:48. Simplicity is good in this context. Check the hull to armor/shield ratio on the enemies. Fallen Empires and Crisis fleets tend to be very light on hull, but heavy on shields and armor, and so effects that bypass them end up being very strong. Corvettes primarily rely on evasion and armor for protection. With limited number of disengage chances , you can safely deal pop shots to the hull and not worry about them retreating before the big guns can cycle. They seek to prevent a technological singularity by eliminating any species capable of creating sentient AI. Science fiction novels that might be interesting to Stellaris players. Disruptors can become quite powerful for a late-game empire that has completed the +5% energy weapon tech repeatable 40 or more times. If you're going to fight the enemy in the system with the disruption field generator (-20% shield hp, for reference), obviously it's beneficial. With regards to disruptors: They're very good in the early game, since everything has little relative HP and fights are mostly at point blank anyways. The best weapon vrs Armor is Plasma 3. Also, full penetration requires the least amount of micro from you. I have tried fleets of corvettes with disruptors and torpedoes - the torpedoes quickly melt through the armor while the disruptors start reducing enemy effectiveness immediately due to hull damage. Stellaris' combat shouldn't be "HoI naval combat but in space". and or hardeners. Zero bombard. 6 composition, I advice : Frontliner ship : Disruptor or PD Corvette or Torpedo brawler Cruiser (torpedo computer) Flak PD ship : PD Destroyer or Torpedo Assault Carrier. The DLC pack includes three new tracks from fan favourite composer Andreas Waldetoft. The Fire Rate changes have made small weapons the strongest they've been since before the last rework, with "Brawler" weapons in particular tending to grow stronger the smaller they are. 如果满足下列条件，则系数 × 1. The three key techs are blue lasers, corvette build cost reduction and extra corvette hull. Depends on the enemy’s defenses. They are capable of passing through shields and armor to wreak havoc directly on enemy hull and crew. Distruptors are good brawling weapons for close range front line ships. Stellaris will throw a lot of curveballs at you while you play. You won't have time to get missiles because you need the engineering tech to get corvette build speed and +100 corvette hull. Unsure. a Tier 3 technology cannot be "drawn" until the country owns at least six Tier 2 technologies. Starbases, defense platforms, Cruisers, Battleships, Juggernauts [not yet available in Console I think] and Star-Eaters [also not yet available in Console]. has a chance to one-shot a corvette. I'd be curious about this, too. You can win the game if you beeline for top disruptors and ignore everything else. The best strategy with awakened empires is to try to deal as many casualties as possible. They will suffer the highest losses and should be the screen for your carrier battleships - outfitted with missiles and X-slot arc emmiters, as others have pointed out. Component. Full Disruptor fleets can be a thing, but the issue is raw DPS. 6? I'd go with this 1. In this video I show how disrupters are highly effective against smaller ships even when used by larger ships such as Cruis. But lasers (which includes plasma / disruptors / lances / energy torpedoes) have the best armor pen / accuracy / tracking compared to kinetic. PD is slightly harder hitting, Flak can reach a higher Tracking. Best example is disruptors. Mining lasers are now classified as Brawling weapons. 1 Anti-Armor 2. ago. Gray Tempest has evenly balanced defenses, but their hull isn't paper-thin like the Contingency's; your best bet is a mix of energy-kinetic. As nonsensical as it would have seemed in 1. Jump to latest Follow Reply. Disruptors work best when you go all-in on them so that you can completely ignore enemy shields and armor. Missiles are also horrifically countered by PDS~~/Strike Craft~~, so anything heavy on missiles is a self-solving problem. This page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 11:48. Stellaris: Disruptor Devastation. Disruptors in game are described as “Disruptors fire energy bolts that damage and destroy the molecular bonds holding the target's constituent atoms together. The Contingency has two main weapons: Seeker Drones and anti-armor. . 4 Anti-Shield 2. Finally, some of the more exotic weaponry have some weird weights to them. Stellaris > Guides > James's Guides . Penetrating weapons (Disruptors and Lightnings) excel in two periods: early-to-mid game and very-late game. It improves the graphics of almost EVERY weapon in the game- adding lots of new custom effects (while staying true to vannilla intentions), improved ship spacing and behavior in battles, adds new EPIC. Have one guy do all point defense, and the other guy do all missles. 23 votes, 22 comments. plasma weapons are great against high armor targets with low-ish evasion (ie. Best. Is the weapon disruptors actually good after the combat changes? I'm encountering The Contingency 10x as the Endgame Crisis, and having a difficult time to against it. Off the top of my head the only things that pierce armor are the Prethoryn swarm hangars and disruptors, and the Prethoryn swarmers only pierce 33%. The upside is that you don't waste research time on any weapon. Content is available under Attribution-ShareAlike 3. 1; Reactions:. With limited number of disengage chances , you can safely deal pop shots to the hull and not worry about them retreating before the big guns can cycle. However these are mostly techno-babble terms than anything realistic and realism has never been a thing Stellaris has (or should) concerned itself with, so just make them look like energy beams that give off light. The disruptor won on 1:1 ratio 2 hardener picket cruiser vs disruptor picket cruiser. Sorry. It dies basically every single time I put it into a fight against a decent fleet. 4. Disruptors have high tracking to ignore evasion and completely ignore armor and shields, making them one of the best anti-Corvette weapons in the game. 裂解炮发射出的高能射束，能够同时弱化并破坏构成目标原子间的分子键。. It's a good idea to have some PD mixed in too. For just shield piercing, strike craft and missiles which are a lot more prevalent in AI fleets. Instead, the techs that you can research are randomly selected from the available techs (from the official Stellaris wiki):. Now countered by armour, or by shield hardening, so best used paired with. Disruptors ignore armor and shields, but have the weakness of having low DPS (also hardening, but the AI doesn't use that). KA + Plasma basically. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. Arc emitter + Cloud lightning/disruptor battleships are the best counters for both of the above. It depends heavily on how the Corvettes were armed. Yes they are good, especially since they can go on battleship m slots, they are also useful for flak destroyers. Disruptors greatest disavantage is the close range. Disruptors are completely rubbish, and plasma are excellents weapons midgame, as in competitiv lobbies protons and neutrons are banned until year 50. 1 Overview 2 Energy weapons 2. How good is a disruptor/ cloud lightning/ emitter monofleet? I know a fleet of corvette's with autocannons followed up by a fleet of BB's with energy…My favourite builds for the smaller ships are either full disruptors with picket combat computers or full missiles with artillery combat computers. The disengagement clearly didn't worked in the beta patch for one example. A properly kitted equals size fleet (Kinetic artilley to start combat, and something like plasma for closer ranges), will output 4-5x more damage with all the extra modifiers. Refire rate and general stats have been adjusted. I find myself just getting back into Stellaris and I was an avid robot build user. Another variant is to add disruptors instead of laser or gauss cannons so shields will be completely bypassed. 1 Laser 2. 2. Have only so many chances to roll for Disengage. Faster-than-light travel, often abbreviated to FTL, is the method by which ships traverse the vast emptiness of space between star systems. Energy Point Defense can also be very useful. + Requirement for Particle (and Tachyon) Lances. Disruptors are an easy mode in the beta, and missiles got some love! Beta is fun with the fleet changes I am having lots of fun when I find the Yuht cryocore as the commonwealth of man and now suddenly my disruptor missile fleets are just strobe lights of death tearing a path through whatever empire they encounter. Same reason as above. What I'm seeing is a technology that unlocks S-, M-, and L-slot Plasma weapons versus a technology that unlocks only S- and M-slot Disruptor weapons versus a technology that unlocks only S-slot Autocannons. ). This is a problem that most modifiers have in Stellaris; instead of each one multiplying the output of the previous one, they all get added together and then applied to the base value. 25. This is a merger for my other two weapon packs, as well as adding in romulan/plasma weapons. Line ship : Torpedo Assault Carrier or Torpedo brawler Cruiser. Gun battery - kinetic weapon, bonus. This page was last edited on 18 April 2022, at 03:36. Missiles and disruptors have been buffed in 3. 0. The issue absolutely is range tho (also one of the main reasons why disruptors suck so hard) There are several schools of thinking (mostly depending on if your playing vs AI or PVP) but im firmly in the camp that range is the single most important stat a weapon can have if your playing vs AI since the AI is insanely exploitable by long range artillery spam. Even then your money seems to be better used on something that completely penetrates either armor or shields, or better yet, destroys them completely, so your autocannons and plasma cannons can finish the job. . DeanTheDull Necrophage • 2 yr. Vulnerable to kinetic weapons. Stellaris' economy is actually limited by hard upper limits on the size of your stockpiles - so actually loosing ships that act as they early 'raiders' until more significant ships come into circulation is a pretty valid (and decent) strategy. Strike craft are good against small ships (corvettes and to a lesser degree destroyers) and they are the best form of point defense in the game. BarnCape Sergeant. + Ignores 100% Armor. First Game on 3. ago. In Stellaris ii's always better to customize fleet to your target than run with all-around designs. 3, no longer locked to ethics or civics every player. The Fire Rate changes have made small weapons the strongest they've been since before the last rework, with "Brawler" weapons in particular tending to grow stronger the smaller they are. 3, and yes I know it's quite long. Pre-FTL civilizations should now generate defensive armies. Content is available under Attribution-ShareAlike 3. 2) Battleships with Arc Emitters and Cloud lightings are insanely powerful (especially with AI mod - because with it AI will able to get own repeatables too and since it pen weapons will start to win over "normal" one). The user interaction aspect utilizes a card shuffle approach rather than a traditional tech tree. As far as I'm aware, Disruptors can't even hit strike craft. As for feats I can name the weapons like Tachyon lance ,Phased disruptor or Devastator torpedoes to name a few but to actually provide the level of power behind those weapons is not so clear cut it's like Babylon 5 first ones they weapons are clearly powerful but you. Disruptors, Autocannons, and Torpedoes are all very strong short-ranged weapons. Toggle signature. 0 unless otherwise noted. Definitely strong, but given how expensive planetary ascension is that doesn't look out of line at all. Missile corvette spam is really strong. Or Energy Torpedos. Cloud lightning has too short a range and dps to be worth using. Armors and shields can be upgraded, and that means they are stronger and stronger, but hull. ago. Related. Otherwise you are mixing the bad traits of both, rather than exploiting the good of either. Mining lasers are now classified as Brawling weapons. Even when the little buggers are destroyed, there are still big juicy ships with a lot of shielding to defile and the idiots with the big guns. The ones who escaped became the Flood, the basically zombie virus of Halo. Energy Weapons (Lasers, Neutron Launchers etc. Otherwise you are mixing the bad traits of both, rather than exploiting the good of either. All of this means that mid and late game the top level laser weapons hit first, hit more types of ships, hit more often, and do more per hit than plasma weapons. Stellaris. Im somewhat new to stellaris and in general not getting my ass handed to me in wars is my weakest part of the game. . All the images are of ship designs the AI created with this mod. nightgerbil • 5 yr. ) You want plasma cannons [at highest level] or neutron launchers [I'd prefer this one] instead of disruptors, and you probably want Artillery sections for your battleship rather than that Broadside section in the core. Not having to fight down those makes disruptors worth using. That sounds OP, how do we counter this? Remember when Stellaris had bombers? Strike Craft that could do heavy damage to larger ships? We should bring those back. The strongest is the still the Fanatic materialist, Xenophobic, technocratic oligarchy with meritocracy (and masterful crafters later). 2 - Starfighters. --------------. Especially if you're aiming for kill rate you'll need very specialized fleet. Mono-cruiser fleets are totally viable. It depends heavily on how the Corvettes were armed. I usually use Arc Emitters + CLC + Disruptors (ie all energy), but if you have bonuses or better tech in kinetic or missiles that's fine, just pick the weapons that will bypass as much of their shields and armor as possible. 7 and considering the buff on armor and shield, I’d consider it buffed by. So for mid game,. Cybernetic - Basically an upgraded version of the old Bio ascension. Stellaris 3. Can fit into Small and Medium slots. how disruptors became god tier in stellaris disruptors are now god tier in stellaris, but why? this video will answer your stellaris ascension perks and ascension paths have been updated with stellaris 3. But why one says ignore and the other penetration I don't know. The disengagement clearly didn't worked in the beta patch for one example. large ships), but corvettes don't have high armor and they have high evasion. The obvious answers: larger fleets, with better tech, and more of them. Completely bypass all shields and armor. Subscribe to download. "Disruptors are now also anti-shield weapons with a longer range than other energy weapons" Like how Point Defences do bonus damage vs armour and ignoring armour, disruptors could do bonus damage to shields and also ignore a percentage of shields. In Stellaris ii's always better to customize fleet to your target than run with all-around designs.